V形前缘对激波入射边界层流动影响的数值模拟与分析

doi:10.13675/j.cnki. tjjs. 180761

推进技术 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11): 2488-2497.DOI: 10.13675/j.cnki. tjjs. 180761

V形前缘对激波入射边界层流动影响的数值模拟与分析

高文智¹,李祝飞²,曹绕¹,曾亿山¹,杨基明²

1.合肥工业大学机械工程学院;2.中国科学技术大学近代力学系，安徽合肥;230027

发布日期:2021-08-15
作者简介:高文智，博士，讲师，研究领域为高超声速空气动力学。E-mail：wzgao@hfut.edu.cn
基金资助:
中国博士后科学基金面上项目 2017M612059;安徽省自然科学基金青年项目 1908085QA14中国博士后科学基金面上项目（2017M612059）；安徽省自然科学基金青年项目（1908085QA14）。

Numerical Studies on Effects of V-Shaped Leading Edge on Incident Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interaction

1.School of Mechanical Engineering,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009,China;2.Department of Modern Mechanics,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230027,China

Published:2021-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为指导V形溢流唇口下游的进气道内部流动分析，采用数值模拟开展V形尖前缘对二维斜激波入射平板边界层流动的影响研究。以气流偏转角6°的二元楔面为基准激波发生器，设计了展向气流收缩角α(0°~60°, 0°对应二元构型)的V形前缘构型，开展对比研究。结果表明，V形前缘构型使得激波入射位置沿展向不均匀、流动具有明显三维特征，并且干扰区壁面压强上升、分离区尺度明显增大。在α=0°~60°范围内，干扰区流动的不均匀程度、分离区尺度随α增大单调增加。进一步分析表明，V形前缘构型干扰具有中间平直、侧边斜掠的耦合入射特性，体现为对称面壁面压强符合自由干扰理论，侧边斜掠入射区参数符合斜掠干扰的锥形流特征。对比二元与α=45°构型的无粘模拟结果，V形前缘会诱导展向两侧对称的斜掠激波、并在对称面相互干扰产生平直的“桥”激波，这使得激波入射位置沿展向不均匀并偏向下游。其中对称面处平直入射激波压升比(2.49)高于二元构型结果(2.24)，侧边斜掠激波强度与二元构型基本一致。这些因素综合导致V形前缘构型的分离尺度增大。

关键词: 激波边界层干扰;V形前缘;高超声速进气道;流动分离;激波干扰

Abstract: In order to instruct the internal flow analysis of hypersonic inlets with V- shaped spillage cowl edges, effects of V-shaped sharp leading edges (VsSLEs) on the incident interactions between oblique shock waves and flat plate boundary layers are investigated through numerical simulations. VsSLE shock generators, parameterized by spanwise swept angle α(0~60°), are designed based on a two- dimensional wedge with flow deflection angle of 6°. The results show that VsSLEs cause non-uniform incident interactions along the spanwise orientation, which induce three dimensional flows in the shock wave boundary layer interaction (SWBLI) regions. The wall surface pressures of VsSLE configurations are higher than those of the two dimensional configuration, and the scales of separated regions are also larger than those of the two dimensional case. The scales of separated regions increase monotonically as α increases within 60°. Further analysis show that the incident SWBLI of a VsSLE wedge is characterized by a flat incident interaction near the symmetry region and a swept incident interaction near the side region. The streamwise wall pressures of the symmetry surface accord well with free interaction theory and the flow parameters of the swept incident regions scales quai-conically. Comparing the inviscid flows of the two- dimensional and the VsSLE(α=45°) configurations, the VsSLE induce two symmetric swept shocks along the spanwise orientation, which interact with each other on the symmetrical plane and generate flat "bridge" shock. These cause the incident positions of the shocks non-uniform along the spanwise orientation and deviate downstream. The pressure rise ratio (2.49) of incident shock on the flat region of the VsSLE configuration is higher than that of the two dimensional configuration (2.24), while the intensity of swept shock is generally the same as that of the two dimensional configuration. These factors lead to the increase of the separation scales of VsSLE configurations.

Key words: Shock wave boundary layer interaction;V-shaped leading edge;Hypersonic inlet;Flow separation;Shock interaction

高文智,李祝飞,曹绕,曾亿山,杨基明. V形前缘对激波入射边界层流动影响的数值模拟与分析[J]. 推进技术, 2019, 40(11): 2488-2497.

GAO Wen-zhi¹,LI Zhu-fei²,CAO Rao¹,ZENG Yi-shan¹,YANG Ji-ming². Numerical Studies on Effects of V-Shaped Leading Edge on Incident Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interaction[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2019, 40(11): 2488-2497.

参考文献

[1] Holger B, Harvey J K， Jean D. Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interactions [M]. Cambridge： Cambridge University Press， 2011.
[2] Anderson G Y， McClinton C R， Weidner J P. Scramjet Performance[M]. Reston： American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics， Inc.， 2000: 369-446.
[3] Dolling D S. Fifty Years of Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction Research: What Next?[J]. AIAA Journal， 2001， 39(8): 1517- 1531.
[4] Gaitonde D V. Progress in Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Interactions[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2015， 72(1): 80- 99.
[5] Schülein E. Skin Friction and Heat Flux Measurements in Shock/Boundary Layer Interaction Flows[J]. AIAA Journal， 2006， 44(8): 1732-1741.
[6] Murray N， Hillier R， Williams S. Experimental Investigation of Axisymmetric Hypersonic Shock-Wave/ Turbulent-Boundary-Layer Interactions[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2013， 714（1）: 152-189.
[7] Korkegi R H. A Simple Correlation for Incipient Turbulent Boundary Layer Separation Due to a Skewed Shock Wave[J]. AIAA Journal， 1973， 11(11): 1578- 1579.
[8] Clemens N T， Narayanaswamy V. Low-Frequency Unsteadiness of Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics， 2014， 46（1）: 469- 492.
[9] Wang B， Sandham N D， Hu Z， et al. Numerical Study of Oblique Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction Considering Sidewall Effects[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2015， 767（3）: 526-561.
[10] Eagle W E， Driscoll J F. Shock Wave–Boundary Layer Interactions in Rectangular Inlets: Three-Dimensional Separation Topology and Critical Points[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2014， 756（10）: 328-353.
[11] Grossman I J， Bruce P K. Effect of Confinement on Shock Wave-Boundary Layer Interactions in Rectangular Intakes[R]. AIAA2016-0348.
[12] Threadgill J S， Staby I， Doehrmannz A. Three- Dimensional Flow Features of Swept Impinging Oblique Shock/Boundary-Layer Interactions[R]. AIAA2017-0759.
[13] Bisek N J. High-Fidelity Simulations of the Hifire-6 Flow Path at Angle of Attack [R]. AIAA2016- 4276.
[14] Steelant J， Varvill R， Defoort S， et al. Achievements Obtained for Sustainted Hypersonic Flight Within the Lapcat-Project[R]. AIAA2015-3677.
[15] Flock A K， Gülhan A. Experimental Investigation of the Starting Behavior of a Three-Dimensional Scramjet Intake[J]. AIAA Journal， 2015， 53(9): 2686-2693.
[16] 金志光，张堃元. 高超侧压式进气道简单唇口调节方案设计[J]. 推进技术， 2008， 29(1): 43- 48. (JIN Zhi-guang， ZHANG Kun-yuan. Concept of a Varied Geometry Scramjet Inlet with Rotatable Cowl[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology， 2008， 29(1): 43-48.)
[17] Xiao F S， Li Z F， Zhang Z Y， et al. Hypersonic Shock Wave Interactions on a V-Shaped Blunt Leading Edge [J]. AIAA Journal， 2018， 56 (1): 356-367.
[18] 蒙泽威，范晓樯，陶渊，等. 三维内收缩式进气道V形溢流口热流计算与分析[J]. 推进技术， 2018， 39(8): 1737-1743.
[19] 张恩来，李祝飞，李一鸣，等. 斜激波入射Ｖ形钝前缘溢流口激波干扰研究[J]. 实验流体力学， 2018， 32(3): 50-57.
[20] Li Y M， Li Z F， Yang J M， et al. Visualization of Hypersonic Inward-Turning Inlet Flows by Planar Laser Scattering Method [R]. AIAA2017- 2358.
[21] 王卫星，郭荣伟. 圆形出口内转式进气道流动特征[J]. 航空学报， 2016， 37(2): 533-544.
[22] Marvin J G， Brown J L， Gnoffo P A. Experimental Database with Baseline CFD Solutions: 2-D and Axisymmetric Hypersonic Shock-Wave/Turbulent-Boundary-Layer Interactions [R]. NASA-TM-2013-216604.
[23] Priebe S， Tu J H， Rowley C W， et al. Low-Frequency Dynamics in a Shock-Induced Separated Flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2016， 807（11）， 441-477.
[24] Giepman R H M， Schrijer F F J， Oudheusden B W. A Parametric Study of Laminar and Transitional Oblique Shock Wave Reflections[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2018， 844（6）， 187-215.
[25] Panaras A G. Review of the Physics of Swept-Shock/Boundary Layer Interactions[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 1996， 32（2）: 172- 244.
[26] Vanstone L， Musta M N， Seckin S， et al. Experimental Study of the Mean Structure and Quasi-Conical Scaling of a Swept-Compression-Ramp Interaction at Mach 2[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2018， 841(4): 1-27.

V形前缘对激波入射边界层流动影响的数值模拟与分析

Numerical Studies on Effects of V-Shaped Leading Edge on Incident Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interaction

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价